Little Women 2019 粵語 線上
Little Women-2019 小鴨 在线-下载-線上看小鴨-线上-完整版本-線上看-豆瓣.jpg
Little Women 2019 粵語 線上
Little Women (电影 2019) | |
持久 | 123 记录 |
发表 | 2019-12-25 |
质量 | MPEG-1 1440P HDTV |
题材 | Drama, Romance |
(机器）代码 | Français, English |
扔 | Ollie D. Magi, Jessie X. Niyan, Rupa K. Vernia |
全体人员 - Little Women 2019 字幕 香港 小鴨
Four sisters come of age in America in the aftermath of the Civil War.
I’m not discounting the new approached Greta has taken here. I personally think it’s great and, in 2019, definitely poignant but it also shows too much respect for only one on-screen woman. I can’t help but feel that, while serving one grand idea, Greta has caused a disservice to those other women in its wake.
- Jess Fenton
Read Jess' full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-little-women-a-21st-century-remake-but-does-it-cause-more-harm-than-good
Opinions are opinions. Subjective or objective, but I find quite interesting the positive response Greta Gerwig's second feature film has received, considering the so self-complacent film she created.
I personally believe that.
Do not confuse that feeling with me saying this is a misdone film. There's talent in her direction but Gerwig instead of looking for a challenge having the doors as open as she has them at the moment, she sat in the conformism and made a film that feels totally built as a ''For Your Consideration '' And be afraid if she's not considered.
I don't deny that Gerwig loves the novel, she shows it and certainly this version is her personal vision but despite the nice attempt, there's nothing new or fresh in her take.
I have to admit and emphasize that at this point it's completely stupid and naive to ask for a radical change in a story which has already been told a lot of times in film, however, it also cannot help feeling like a cheap mean of exploiting the story considering our current times, where feminism is now a driving force in the industry.
Like I said, she went for the safe bet.
And yet despite Gerwig's attempt to increase that specific plot weight, she also avoids going to issues that wouldn't work for the story she was trying to tell, because although they're not girls with money, they have the privilege of being protected from the civil war.
Jo is a young woman aware of herself and her mind, which in those times wasn't something positive but obviously the external world is not a concern for her, only her personal interests. And that's ok, we get to be that way, especially when we're young, but how do you try to make woke characters, if it's only in the things that suits them?
That's where the pertinent questions should be asked about what it was decided to take in order to make this new version work according to the director's perspective.
In the end, despite the production quality, Little Women is just a conventional and ordinary repetition of a literary classic that I personally think has already been too used.
But the proposal works both to be loved and to be hated and that depends a lot on the mentality you carry with you when you go to see it.
As always the rest depends on what you get from the film.
Guess 2019's just the year for Florence Pugh to be in critically acclaimed and letterboxd beloved movies that I just genuinely didn't care for much.
_Final rating:★★ - Definitely not for me, but I sort of get the appeal._
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog @
https://www.msbreviews.com
The 92nd Academy Awards are presented this Sunday, and Little Women is part of the few 2019 releases that are only now (2020) being shown in my country. I really want to watch every Best Picture nominee before the ceremony not only to provide my honest predictions but also to have a Top10: Best Movies of 2019 more complete regarding the number of films watched. Well, Greta Gerwig's adaptation of the famous book isn't able to crack a spot in my Top10, but it's definitely worth an honorable mention.
There's been a lot of controversy surrounding the Best Director category, way beyond just the Oscars. The lack of a female nominee across a few award shows raised some discontent, and most considered Gerwig's work to be more than enough to warrant more nominations, especially at the Academy Awards. Now, I'm going to be as polite, respectful, and fair as I can. While I do agree that Gerwig does a great job in directing this movie, I still believe that the five male directors nominated for the respective Oscar did an even better one. Even removing Todd Phillips (Joker) out of the equation (which I entirely accept), I would definitely choose Noah Baumbach (Marriage Story) as his replacement.
With that said, do I suddenly become a misogynist? Do I always favor men when I send my own ballots to the OFTA Awards, for example? I don't think so. It's just a humble opinion. Putting that discussion aside, let's focus on the positive aspects of Little Women because there are many! Usually, romance isn't a genre I tend to love, but I really enjoyed this adaptation of Alcott's famous novel. I'll start with the cast because how can't I?
With such a stellar team of actors, I knew I was going to receive some amazing performances. Every character gets a lot of screentime, but Saoirse Ronan is definitely the lead as Jo. She's the odd sister, the one that doesn't really want to follow the "rules" of being a woman in the XIX century. She wants to do what she loves for a living and be independent without having to be this housewife that simply married a rich man. She wants to be remembered. Saoirse incorporates this personality like it's her own, and adds another brilliant display to her acting career.
However, Florence Pugh gives the standout performance as Amy. Undoubtedly, Pugh is the breakthrough actress of this last year. Fantastic physical display in Fighting with my Family, one of the best performances of 2019 in Midsommar, and the most complex role of her career in Little Women. Since the story is continuously going back and forward in time, everyone has to portray two versions of the same character, but Amy is the one that changes the most. As a childish, immature, silly, young Amy, Pugh delivers some of the funniest moments of the film. Truly hilarious at some points. Then, as an adult Amy, she's more grounded, responsible, and about to follow one of the "rules" of society regarding women: marrying a rich man.
Eliza Scanlen carries an emotional arc as Beth, and the best past-present sequence is due to her. Emma Watson is Meg, the older sister who everyone looks up to since she seems to be perfect, so her arc goes through some demonstrations of how her imperfections make her a role model to her sisters. Timothée Chalamet is also one of the standouts as Laurie, a neighbor who gets close to the March family, but I won't delve into too many details regarding his story. Laura Dern (Marmee March) and Meryl Streep (Aunt March) are perfect as always. Every character arc is exceptionally developed. With a runtime slightly over two hours, it's remarkable the level of detail, complexity, and depth that the characters possess.
I can't address every single one in detail since there are so many, but I tried my best to give an overview of each of the main ones. Clearly, Jo, Laurie, and Amy's arcs are the absolute best. However, Emma Watson's character story is the one that feels too superficial and too simple compared with her sisters'. It doesn't really feel like she went through any change throughout the years, and part of her story feels a bit forced. Beth's arc might also be straightforward, but since it's associated with an emotionally powerful plot point, one can understand her little screentime.
The past-present storytelling method works for the most part. There are a couple of moments beautifully and seamlessly "stitched" together, giving the viewer a sense of fulfillment by witnessing the start and end of a little story that happened in the past and later in the present under other circumstances. Nevertheless, some sequences either drag too much or lack emotional investment. Since the movie crosses the two-hour mark, I found myself bored during certain storylines that failed to captivate me.
In a film with so many characters, it's very common to give more focus to only a few of them. It's impossible to call someone a protagonist if half a dozen characters have the same or more screentime or plot relevance. However, this always brings the issue of not being able to fascinate the audience with every character arc. Also, some past-present transitions are so abrupt that they disrupt the overall pacing by being a bit confusing. Nevertheless, Greta Gerwig does an excellent job in balancing these timelines, and an even better one by opposing the contrasting tones of each period and still make them consistent.
Technically, Yorick Le Saux offers gorgeous cinematography, Alexandre Desplat provides a subtle yet efficient score, but the costume design steals the show by being extremely period-accurate. The colors of the whole movie tell a story on their own, as well as the set design, so be sure to look around on each wide shot because there is much to see behind the actors.
In the end, Little Women doesn't do enough to warrant a spot in my 2019's Top10, but Greta Gerwig's adaptation of the classic graphic novel deserves all of the screenplay awards it has been receiving so far. As expected, the whole cast is phenomenal, but Saoirse Ronan, Florence Pugh, and Timothée Chalamet not only deliver the best performances of the film, but their characters carry the most compelling arcs. With so many people, it's remarkable the level of detail, complexity, and depth that each character has. However, some storylines are not as captivating as others, and the pacing suffers from these less exciting stories, which bring the movie down for some moments. The past-present transitions are mostly well-handled but a few are too confusing and abrupt. The contrasting tones of each timeline are consistent throughout the runtime, and the costume design steals the "technical spotlight". Overall, it's a pretty good romance, so if you enjoy the genre, I can't see why you shouldn't enjoy this one.
Rating: B+
剧组人员
協調美術系 : Pagan Orsen
特技協調員 : Malki Malek
Skript Aufteilung :Jamir Verrill
附圖片 : Khalen Jaleesa
Co-Produzent : Marlana Audet
執行製片人 : Zeren Malot
監督藝術總監 : Janiyah Renaiya
產生 : Amalric Tomek
Hersteller : Josef Azealia
竞赛者 : Romy Marcel
Film kurz
花費 : $980,275,337
收入 : $335,411,011
分類 : 復仇來自警察 - 信任, 數學 - 流行的你兒子錄音, 天空 - 電影原聲
生產國 : 巴哈馬
生產 : Asylum Annex
Little Women 2019 粵語 線上
《2019電影》Little Women 完整電影在線免費, Little Women[2019,HD]線上看, Little Women20190p完整的電影在線, Little Women∼【2019.HD.BD】. Little Women2019-HD完整版本, Little Women('2019)完整版在線
Little Women 埃斯特（數學）動物學-詩歌 |電影院|長片由卡通統治和 Studio Moderna Varya Kadin aus dem Jahre 1982 mit Jaheim Joli und Duhem Roran in den major role, der in Streetwise Entertainment Group und im Cinecove 意 世界。 電影史是從 喬佛爾 Mayya 製造並在 Plexi Productions 大會圭亞那 在 5 。 一月 2009 在14。 十二月2006.
蔡詩芸 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 蔡詩芸（1986年4月6日－），原名蔡詩蕓，父親是澳洲華裔建築師、母親是上海人1，出生於澳洲雪梨，台灣饒舌女歌手。2005年發行個人首張專輯《紫外線》。丈夫為演員王陽明2。
權娜拉 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 權娜拉 女艺人 本名 權我潤 1 原文名 권아윤 罗马拼音 Kwon Ayoon 英文名 Nara 昵称 權多奇 2 国籍 韩国出生 權娜拉（권나라，Kwon Nara） 1991年3月13日 （ 28歲） 韩国 京畿道 城南市职业 歌手、演員 语言 韓語、英語 教育程度 同德女子大學放送演藝學系
素媛 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 《素媛》（韓語： 소원，谚文拉丁文字转写Sowon）是2013年上映的一部韩国电影，由李濬益執导，薛景求、严智苑、李蕊担任主演。1 取材自2008年在韓國發生的真實案例。以兒童性暴力為題材，講述家屬與其周圍人物在絕望之中為受害人治癒傷痛的故事。
小熊維尼 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 小熊維尼（英語：Winnie the Pooh，簡稱為Pooh、Pooh Bear），1925年12月24日首次面世，以聖誕故事形式在倫敦《新聞晚報》刊出；第一本《小熊維尼》故事書於1926年10月出版。小熊維尼是艾倫·亞歷山大·米恩為他的兒子創作的一隻漫畫熊；而古典維尼是由謝培德（EH
PRISTIN 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 此條目可能过多或不当地使用了受版权保护的文字、图像及多媒体文件。 2018年4月24日请仔细阅读有关媒体文件合理使用的方针和指引，并协助改正违反规定的使用，然后移除此消息框。在条目讨论页可能有更多的详细信息。
瑪歌·羅比 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 女演员 原文名 Margot Robbie 出生 瑪歌·艾麗絲·羅比 （Margot Elise Robbie） 1990年7月2日 （ 29歲） 澳大利亚 昆士蘭州 多爾比职业 演員 配偶 Tom Ackerley （2016年結婚） 活跃年代 2008年至今 经纪公司 创新艺人经纪公司（CAA）
賈斯汀·杜魯多 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 賈斯汀·皮耶·占士·杜魯多 PC MP（法語：Justin Pierre James Trudeau，1971年12月25日－），加拿大政治人物，現任加拿大總理，加拿大自由黨黨魁及加拿大眾議院帕皮諾選區議員，並曾任該黨的青年、專上教育及業餘體育事務評議員。上任時以43歲之齡成為加拿大歷史
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar